The energy and nutrient density of food is used to assess food groups in the context of a healthy diet or weight reduction. The background: The goal should be the highest possible nutrient and low energy content in our food. However, the terms are often misunderstood and misused. As a result, the interpretation and practical relevance are sometimes misleading. To make matters worse: Not every food with a high-calorie content is unsuitable per se, as it can also contain numerous essential nutrients. Conversely, it makes little sense to eat low-calorie foods that cannot meet the nutritional needs.
Energy density: assessment of energy content
The energy density describes the energy content in
kilocalories per gram consumed. Foods with an energy content below 150 kcal per
100 g are generally considered low in energy. Contents between 150 and 250 kcal
are energy moderate. Therefore, food with more than 250 kcal per 100 g is deemed
high in power.
The energy density of food can be determined and categorized relatively easily. An interactive table showing the energy density of food can be found on page 2 of this article.
Nutrient density: Assessment of the nutrient content
The nutrient density should enable qualitative statements to
be made about food choice. Several definitions are circulating in the
specialist books. They all have a mutual relationship between the nutrient
content and the respective food's energy content.
Since our body needs the various nutrients in entirely
different amounts, it isn't easy to aggregate the nutrient content for all
nutrients. Strictly speaking, to make foods comparable with one another, a
nutrient density to be calculated always relates to a single nutrient.
With this definition, there are already some difficulties. If a high nutrient density per se is desirable and this always relates to a single nutrient, foods rich in sugar and high in salt are also recommended since sugar and salt are also nutrients (carbohydrates and sodium). Here, nutrients would have to be differentiated depending on the consumption recommendation.
A general classification of all foods according to nutrient density is therefore tricky. That also makes it unsuitable for practice.
Therefore, in some specialist books, nutrient density
relates in the narrower sense to the average micronutrient content such as
vitamins and minerals.
It would then be understandable that fresh vegetables or fresh herbs should be classified as nutrient-dense due to their small calorie and high micronutrient content, especially minerals and vitamins. On the other hand, chips, pizza, or croissants score poorly due to their very high energy content with manageable minerals and vitamins and low nutrient density.
If, on the other hand, the nutrient density relates to the content of essential nutrients, the following food classification could be formulated:
high nutrient density
Foods with a low energy content and a high nutritional content
It would then be understandable that fresh vegetables or fresh herbs should be classified as nutrient-dense due to their low calorie and height micronutrient content, especially minerals and vitamins. On the other hand, chips, pizza, or croissants score poorly due to their very high energy content with manageable minerals and vitamins and low nutrient density.
If, on the other hand, the nutrient density relates to the content of essential nutrients, the following food classification could be formulated:
high nutrient density
Foods with a low energy content and a high nutritional content
moderate to high nutrient density
Medium-energy, high-nutrient foods.
low nutrient density
Foods with a high energy content and a low nutritional content
Medium-energy, high-nutrient foods
low nutrient density
Foods with a high energy content and a low nutritional
content